Цитата:
Helgi of Lipetsk пишет:
"неизвестный дориатец"
|
Это который? Тот, кто сообщил Наугладуру о том, что Тинвэлинт отпраился на охоту? Так его Нартсегом (Narthseg) звали. Тогда уж надо в пятую "номинацию" ещё и Ufedhin'а (понятия не имею, как его имя передавать кириллицей) зачислять. Или мы всё же про разных дориатцев?:-)
Oakenshield, а вы уверены, что после ваших подобных "выступлений" к вам будут относиться серьёзно?
А относительно эльфов - почитайте письмо 154: "But the Elves are not wholly good or in the right."
А по теме особенно рекомендую письмо 183. Там как раз про проблематику и схематичность. Процитирую отрывок: "There are also conflicts about important things or ideas. In such cases I am more impressed by the extreme importance of being on the right side, than I am disturbed by the revelation of the jungle of confused motives, private purposes, and individual actions (noble or base) in which the right and the wrong in actual human conflicts are commonly involved. If the conflict really is about things properly called right and wrong, or good and evil, then the rightness or goodness of one side is not proved or established by the claims of either side; it must depend on values and beliefs above and independent of the particular conflict. A judge must assign right and wrong according to principles which he holds valid in all cases. That being so, the right will remain an inalienable possession of the right side and Justify its cause throughout. (I speak of causes, not of individuals ... Similarly, good actions by those on the wrong side will not justify their cause. There may be deeds on the wrong side of heroic courage, or some of a higher moral level: deeds of mercy and forbearance. A judge may accord them honour and rejoice to see how some men can rise above the hate and anger of a conflict; even as he may deplore the evil deeds on the right side and be grieved to see how hatred once provoked can drag them down. But this will not alter his judgement as to which side was in the right, nor his assignment of the primary blame for all the evil that followed to the other side." На самом деле в указанном письме намного больше информации. И вообще, искренне рекомендую больше читать Толкина и меньше смотреть (а тем паче, цитировать) перевод Гоблина. Знание последнего чести не делает.:-)