Филология в действии - - Форум Арды-на-Куличках

Marya · 01.10.03, 19:49

Попал тут мне в руки текст выступления создателей фильма из DVD к первой части (подозреваю, что это либо Филиппа Бойенс, либо Фрэн Уолш) с вот такой фразой, коей спешу поделиться с учеными коллегами:

It seems to me that the Ringwraiths are Tolkien's most original and distinctive image of evil. And since he's a philologist, I think we should think about the word “wraith”. All right, what's a wraith? Well, it's actually related to words we know. For instance, it's related to “wrath”, which is anger. It's related to “wreath”, which is a twisted thing. It's related to the word “writhe”, which is to, you know, twist and turn. And all these suggest that actually a wraith is something which is defined by shape, not by substance.

*Все, я был неправ, объяснения ниже...*** :( :( :(

01.10.03, 19:49	#1
Marya youngling На форуме с: 04.2003 Сообщений: 36	Филология в действии - FOTR SEE Попал тут мне в руки текст выступления создателей фильма из DVD к первой части (подозреваю, что это либо Филиппа Бойенс, либо Фрэн Уолш) с вот такой фразой, коей спешу поделиться с учеными коллегами: It seems to me that the Ringwraiths are Tolkien's most original and distinctive image of evil. And since he's a philologist, I think we should think about the word “wraith”. All right, what's a wraith? Well, it's actually related to words we know. For instance, it's related to “wrath”, which is anger. It's related to “wreath”, which is a twisted thing. It's related to the word “writhe”, which is to, you know, twist and turn. And all these suggest that actually a wraith is something which is defined by shape, not by substance. Все, я был неправ, объяснения ниже...** :( :( :( Last edited by Marya; 02.10.03 at 02:05.